plexiglas box Search Results


clear plexiglas box  (Lab Products Inc)
90
Lab Products Inc clear plexiglas box
Clear Plexiglas Box, supplied by Lab Products Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/clear plexiglas box/product/Lab Products Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
clear plexiglas box - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
plexiglas conditioning chamber noldus phenotyper  (Noldus Information Technology)
90
Noldus Information Technology plexiglas conditioning chamber noldus phenotyper
Heterozygous PME-KO mice are resistant to Aβ-induced impairments in contextual fear <t>conditioning.</t> A, Plot of average percent of time spent freezing (±SEM) during initial exposure to the training context (baseline) and 24 h after footshock for the indicated groups. ANOVA for freezing at 24 h showed a significant difference among groups (F(3,70) = 4.424, p = 0.0066). Tukey's multiple comparisons show that only the control+Aβ group was significantly different from all other groups (p = 0.0218 vs control+vehicle, p = 0.0367 vs PME-KO+vehicle, and p = 0.0164 vs PME-KO+Aβ*). No differences in baseline freezing on day 1 were observed among groups (ANOVA: F(3,70) = 0.7894, p = 0.5039). N = 16 control+vehicle, 20 control+Aβ, 20 PME-KO+vehicle, and 18 PME-KO+Aβ. B, Plot of average distance traveled (±SEM) for the indicated groups during 10 min exposures to an open field environment on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for distance with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 41.31, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 2, p = 0.1262). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. C, Plot of average number of entries into the center of an open field arena (±SEM) for the indicated groups during two 10 min exposures on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for entries with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 47.28, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 0.5627, p = 0.6422). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. D, Plot of average threshold for responses to footshocks of increasing intensity for the indicated groups revealed no significant differences in footshock perception (ANOVA for visible response: F(3,79) = 0.0092, p = 0.9988; for gross motor response: F(3,79) = 1.119, p = 0.3467; for vocalization: F(3,79) = 0.4069, p = 0.7484). N = 16 control+vehicle, 23 control+Aβ, 23 PME+vehicle, and 21 PME+Aβ.
Plexiglas Conditioning Chamber Noldus Phenotyper, supplied by Noldus Information Technology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/plexiglas conditioning chamber noldus phenotyper/product/Noldus Information Technology
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
plexiglas conditioning chamber noldus phenotyper - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
plexiglas box  (Belco Inc)
90
Belco Inc plexiglas box
Heterozygous PME-KO mice are resistant to Aβ-induced impairments in contextual fear <t>conditioning.</t> A, Plot of average percent of time spent freezing (±SEM) during initial exposure to the training context (baseline) and 24 h after footshock for the indicated groups. ANOVA for freezing at 24 h showed a significant difference among groups (F(3,70) = 4.424, p = 0.0066). Tukey's multiple comparisons show that only the control+Aβ group was significantly different from all other groups (p = 0.0218 vs control+vehicle, p = 0.0367 vs PME-KO+vehicle, and p = 0.0164 vs PME-KO+Aβ*). No differences in baseline freezing on day 1 were observed among groups (ANOVA: F(3,70) = 0.7894, p = 0.5039). N = 16 control+vehicle, 20 control+Aβ, 20 PME-KO+vehicle, and 18 PME-KO+Aβ. B, Plot of average distance traveled (±SEM) for the indicated groups during 10 min exposures to an open field environment on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for distance with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 41.31, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 2, p = 0.1262). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. C, Plot of average number of entries into the center of an open field arena (±SEM) for the indicated groups during two 10 min exposures on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for entries with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 47.28, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 0.5627, p = 0.6422). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. D, Plot of average threshold for responses to footshocks of increasing intensity for the indicated groups revealed no significant differences in footshock perception (ANOVA for visible response: F(3,79) = 0.0092, p = 0.9988; for gross motor response: F(3,79) = 1.119, p = 0.3467; for vocalization: F(3,79) = 0.4069, p = 0.7484). N = 16 control+vehicle, 23 control+Aβ, 23 PME+vehicle, and 21 PME+Aβ.
Plexiglas Box, supplied by Belco Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/plexiglas box/product/Belco Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
plexiglas box - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
plexiglas box  (Lafayette Instrument Co Inc)
90
Lafayette Instrument Co Inc plexiglas box
Heterozygous PME-KO mice are resistant to Aβ-induced impairments in contextual fear <t>conditioning.</t> A, Plot of average percent of time spent freezing (±SEM) during initial exposure to the training context (baseline) and 24 h after footshock for the indicated groups. ANOVA for freezing at 24 h showed a significant difference among groups (F(3,70) = 4.424, p = 0.0066). Tukey's multiple comparisons show that only the control+Aβ group was significantly different from all other groups (p = 0.0218 vs control+vehicle, p = 0.0367 vs PME-KO+vehicle, and p = 0.0164 vs PME-KO+Aβ*). No differences in baseline freezing on day 1 were observed among groups (ANOVA: F(3,70) = 0.7894, p = 0.5039). N = 16 control+vehicle, 20 control+Aβ, 20 PME-KO+vehicle, and 18 PME-KO+Aβ. B, Plot of average distance traveled (±SEM) for the indicated groups during 10 min exposures to an open field environment on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for distance with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 41.31, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 2, p = 0.1262). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. C, Plot of average number of entries into the center of an open field arena (±SEM) for the indicated groups during two 10 min exposures on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for entries with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 47.28, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 0.5627, p = 0.6422). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. D, Plot of average threshold for responses to footshocks of increasing intensity for the indicated groups revealed no significant differences in footshock perception (ANOVA for visible response: F(3,79) = 0.0092, p = 0.9988; for gross motor response: F(3,79) = 1.119, p = 0.3467; for vocalization: F(3,79) = 0.4069, p = 0.7484). N = 16 control+vehicle, 23 control+Aβ, 23 PME+vehicle, and 21 PME+Aβ.
Plexiglas Box, supplied by Lafayette Instrument Co Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/plexiglas box/product/Lafayette Instrument Co Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
plexiglas box - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
plexiglas box  (Stoelting inc)
90
Stoelting inc plexiglas box
Heterozygous PME-KO mice are resistant to Aβ-induced impairments in contextual fear <t>conditioning.</t> A, Plot of average percent of time spent freezing (±SEM) during initial exposure to the training context (baseline) and 24 h after footshock for the indicated groups. ANOVA for freezing at 24 h showed a significant difference among groups (F(3,70) = 4.424, p = 0.0066). Tukey's multiple comparisons show that only the control+Aβ group was significantly different from all other groups (p = 0.0218 vs control+vehicle, p = 0.0367 vs PME-KO+vehicle, and p = 0.0164 vs PME-KO+Aβ*). No differences in baseline freezing on day 1 were observed among groups (ANOVA: F(3,70) = 0.7894, p = 0.5039). N = 16 control+vehicle, 20 control+Aβ, 20 PME-KO+vehicle, and 18 PME-KO+Aβ. B, Plot of average distance traveled (±SEM) for the indicated groups during 10 min exposures to an open field environment on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for distance with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 41.31, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 2, p = 0.1262). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. C, Plot of average number of entries into the center of an open field arena (±SEM) for the indicated groups during two 10 min exposures on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for entries with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 47.28, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 0.5627, p = 0.6422). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. D, Plot of average threshold for responses to footshocks of increasing intensity for the indicated groups revealed no significant differences in footshock perception (ANOVA for visible response: F(3,79) = 0.0092, p = 0.9988; for gross motor response: F(3,79) = 1.119, p = 0.3467; for vocalization: F(3,79) = 0.4069, p = 0.7484). N = 16 control+vehicle, 23 control+Aβ, 23 PME+vehicle, and 21 PME+Aβ.
Plexiglas Box, supplied by Stoelting inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/plexiglas box/product/Stoelting inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
plexiglas box - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
plexiglas box  (Air Liquide)
90
Air Liquide plexiglas box
Heterozygous PME-KO mice are resistant to Aβ-induced impairments in contextual fear <t>conditioning.</t> A, Plot of average percent of time spent freezing (±SEM) during initial exposure to the training context (baseline) and 24 h after footshock for the indicated groups. ANOVA for freezing at 24 h showed a significant difference among groups (F(3,70) = 4.424, p = 0.0066). Tukey's multiple comparisons show that only the control+Aβ group was significantly different from all other groups (p = 0.0218 vs control+vehicle, p = 0.0367 vs PME-KO+vehicle, and p = 0.0164 vs PME-KO+Aβ*). No differences in baseline freezing on day 1 were observed among groups (ANOVA: F(3,70) = 0.7894, p = 0.5039). N = 16 control+vehicle, 20 control+Aβ, 20 PME-KO+vehicle, and 18 PME-KO+Aβ. B, Plot of average distance traveled (±SEM) for the indicated groups during 10 min exposures to an open field environment on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for distance with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 41.31, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 2, p = 0.1262). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. C, Plot of average number of entries into the center of an open field arena (±SEM) for the indicated groups during two 10 min exposures on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for entries with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 47.28, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 0.5627, p = 0.6422). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. D, Plot of average threshold for responses to footshocks of increasing intensity for the indicated groups revealed no significant differences in footshock perception (ANOVA for visible response: F(3,79) = 0.0092, p = 0.9988; for gross motor response: F(3,79) = 1.119, p = 0.3467; for vocalization: F(3,79) = 0.4069, p = 0.7484). N = 16 control+vehicle, 23 control+Aβ, 23 PME+vehicle, and 21 PME+Aβ.
Plexiglas Box, supplied by Air Liquide, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/plexiglas box/product/Air Liquide
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
plexiglas box - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
hot plate plexiglas box  (IITC Life Science)
90
IITC Life Science hot plate plexiglas box
Heterozygous PME-KO mice are resistant to Aβ-induced impairments in contextual fear <t>conditioning.</t> A, Plot of average percent of time spent freezing (±SEM) during initial exposure to the training context (baseline) and 24 h after footshock for the indicated groups. ANOVA for freezing at 24 h showed a significant difference among groups (F(3,70) = 4.424, p = 0.0066). Tukey's multiple comparisons show that only the control+Aβ group was significantly different from all other groups (p = 0.0218 vs control+vehicle, p = 0.0367 vs PME-KO+vehicle, and p = 0.0164 vs PME-KO+Aβ*). No differences in baseline freezing on day 1 were observed among groups (ANOVA: F(3,70) = 0.7894, p = 0.5039). N = 16 control+vehicle, 20 control+Aβ, 20 PME-KO+vehicle, and 18 PME-KO+Aβ. B, Plot of average distance traveled (±SEM) for the indicated groups during 10 min exposures to an open field environment on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for distance with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 41.31, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 2, p = 0.1262). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. C, Plot of average number of entries into the center of an open field arena (±SEM) for the indicated groups during two 10 min exposures on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for entries with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 47.28, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 0.5627, p = 0.6422). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. D, Plot of average threshold for responses to footshocks of increasing intensity for the indicated groups revealed no significant differences in footshock perception (ANOVA for visible response: F(3,79) = 0.0092, p = 0.9988; for gross motor response: F(3,79) = 1.119, p = 0.3467; for vocalization: F(3,79) = 0.4069, p = 0.7484). N = 16 control+vehicle, 23 control+Aβ, 23 PME+vehicle, and 21 PME+Aβ.
Hot Plate Plexiglas Box, supplied by IITC Life Science, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/hot plate plexiglas box/product/IITC Life Science
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hot plate plexiglas box - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
three-chambered plexiglas box  (Muromachi Kikai)
90
Muromachi Kikai three-chambered plexiglas box
Heterozygous PME-KO mice are resistant to Aβ-induced impairments in contextual fear <t>conditioning.</t> A, Plot of average percent of time spent freezing (±SEM) during initial exposure to the training context (baseline) and 24 h after footshock for the indicated groups. ANOVA for freezing at 24 h showed a significant difference among groups (F(3,70) = 4.424, p = 0.0066). Tukey's multiple comparisons show that only the control+Aβ group was significantly different from all other groups (p = 0.0218 vs control+vehicle, p = 0.0367 vs PME-KO+vehicle, and p = 0.0164 vs PME-KO+Aβ*). No differences in baseline freezing on day 1 were observed among groups (ANOVA: F(3,70) = 0.7894, p = 0.5039). N = 16 control+vehicle, 20 control+Aβ, 20 PME-KO+vehicle, and 18 PME-KO+Aβ. B, Plot of average distance traveled (±SEM) for the indicated groups during 10 min exposures to an open field environment on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for distance with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 41.31, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 2, p = 0.1262). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. C, Plot of average number of entries into the center of an open field arena (±SEM) for the indicated groups during two 10 min exposures on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for entries with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 47.28, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 0.5627, p = 0.6422). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. D, Plot of average threshold for responses to footshocks of increasing intensity for the indicated groups revealed no significant differences in footshock perception (ANOVA for visible response: F(3,79) = 0.0092, p = 0.9988; for gross motor response: F(3,79) = 1.119, p = 0.3467; for vocalization: F(3,79) = 0.4069, p = 0.7484). N = 16 control+vehicle, 23 control+Aβ, 23 PME+vehicle, and 21 PME+Aβ.
Three Chambered Plexiglas Box, supplied by Muromachi Kikai, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/three-chambered plexiglas box/product/Muromachi Kikai
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
three-chambered plexiglas box - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
plexiglas boxes  (Noldus Information Technology)
90
Noldus Information Technology plexiglas boxes
Heterozygous PME-KO mice are resistant to Aβ-induced impairments in contextual fear <t>conditioning.</t> A, Plot of average percent of time spent freezing (±SEM) during initial exposure to the training context (baseline) and 24 h after footshock for the indicated groups. ANOVA for freezing at 24 h showed a significant difference among groups (F(3,70) = 4.424, p = 0.0066). Tukey's multiple comparisons show that only the control+Aβ group was significantly different from all other groups (p = 0.0218 vs control+vehicle, p = 0.0367 vs PME-KO+vehicle, and p = 0.0164 vs PME-KO+Aβ*). No differences in baseline freezing on day 1 were observed among groups (ANOVA: F(3,70) = 0.7894, p = 0.5039). N = 16 control+vehicle, 20 control+Aβ, 20 PME-KO+vehicle, and 18 PME-KO+Aβ. B, Plot of average distance traveled (±SEM) for the indicated groups during 10 min exposures to an open field environment on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for distance with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 41.31, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 2, p = 0.1262). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. C, Plot of average number of entries into the center of an open field arena (±SEM) for the indicated groups during two 10 min exposures on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for entries with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 47.28, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 0.5627, p = 0.6422). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. D, Plot of average threshold for responses to footshocks of increasing intensity for the indicated groups revealed no significant differences in footshock perception (ANOVA for visible response: F(3,79) = 0.0092, p = 0.9988; for gross motor response: F(3,79) = 1.119, p = 0.3467; for vocalization: F(3,79) = 0.4069, p = 0.7484). N = 16 control+vehicle, 23 control+Aβ, 23 PME+vehicle, and 21 PME+Aβ.
Plexiglas Boxes, supplied by Noldus Information Technology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/plexiglas boxes/product/Noldus Information Technology
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
plexiglas boxes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
plexiglas box (40.6 × 40.6 × 40.6 cm)  (Coulbourn Instruments)
90
Coulbourn Instruments plexiglas box (40.6 × 40.6 × 40.6 cm)
Heterozygous PME-KO mice are resistant to Aβ-induced impairments in contextual fear <t>conditioning.</t> A, Plot of average percent of time spent freezing (±SEM) during initial exposure to the training context (baseline) and 24 h after footshock for the indicated groups. ANOVA for freezing at 24 h showed a significant difference among groups (F(3,70) = 4.424, p = 0.0066). Tukey's multiple comparisons show that only the control+Aβ group was significantly different from all other groups (p = 0.0218 vs control+vehicle, p = 0.0367 vs PME-KO+vehicle, and p = 0.0164 vs PME-KO+Aβ*). No differences in baseline freezing on day 1 were observed among groups (ANOVA: F(3,70) = 0.7894, p = 0.5039). N = 16 control+vehicle, 20 control+Aβ, 20 PME-KO+vehicle, and 18 PME-KO+Aβ. B, Plot of average distance traveled (±SEM) for the indicated groups during 10 min exposures to an open field environment on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for distance with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 41.31, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 2, p = 0.1262). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. C, Plot of average number of entries into the center of an open field arena (±SEM) for the indicated groups during two 10 min exposures on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for entries with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 47.28, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 0.5627, p = 0.6422). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. D, Plot of average threshold for responses to footshocks of increasing intensity for the indicated groups revealed no significant differences in footshock perception (ANOVA for visible response: F(3,79) = 0.0092, p = 0.9988; for gross motor response: F(3,79) = 1.119, p = 0.3467; for vocalization: F(3,79) = 0.4069, p = 0.7484). N = 16 control+vehicle, 23 control+Aβ, 23 PME+vehicle, and 21 PME+Aβ.
Plexiglas Box (40.6 × 40.6 × 40.6 Cm), supplied by Coulbourn Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/plexiglas box (40.6 × 40.6 × 40.6 cm)/product/Coulbourn Instruments
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
plexiglas box (40.6 × 40.6 × 40.6 cm) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
plexiglas operant box  (VULINTUS LLC)
90
VULINTUS LLC plexiglas operant box
Heterozygous PME-KO mice are resistant to Aβ-induced impairments in contextual fear <t>conditioning.</t> A, Plot of average percent of time spent freezing (±SEM) during initial exposure to the training context (baseline) and 24 h after footshock for the indicated groups. ANOVA for freezing at 24 h showed a significant difference among groups (F(3,70) = 4.424, p = 0.0066). Tukey's multiple comparisons show that only the control+Aβ group was significantly different from all other groups (p = 0.0218 vs control+vehicle, p = 0.0367 vs PME-KO+vehicle, and p = 0.0164 vs PME-KO+Aβ*). No differences in baseline freezing on day 1 were observed among groups (ANOVA: F(3,70) = 0.7894, p = 0.5039). N = 16 control+vehicle, 20 control+Aβ, 20 PME-KO+vehicle, and 18 PME-KO+Aβ. B, Plot of average distance traveled (±SEM) for the indicated groups during 10 min exposures to an open field environment on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for distance with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 41.31, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 2, p = 0.1262). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. C, Plot of average number of entries into the center of an open field arena (±SEM) for the indicated groups during two 10 min exposures on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for entries with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 47.28, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 0.5627, p = 0.6422). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. D, Plot of average threshold for responses to footshocks of increasing intensity for the indicated groups revealed no significant differences in footshock perception (ANOVA for visible response: F(3,79) = 0.0092, p = 0.9988; for gross motor response: F(3,79) = 1.119, p = 0.3467; for vocalization: F(3,79) = 0.4069, p = 0.7484). N = 16 control+vehicle, 23 control+Aβ, 23 PME+vehicle, and 21 PME+Aβ.
Plexiglas Operant Box, supplied by VULINTUS LLC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/plexiglas operant box/product/VULINTUS LLC
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
plexiglas operant box - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gray squared plexiglas open box (50 2)  (Panlab)
90
Panlab gray squared plexiglas open box (50 2)
Heterozygous PME-KO mice are resistant to Aβ-induced impairments in contextual fear <t>conditioning.</t> A, Plot of average percent of time spent freezing (±SEM) during initial exposure to the training context (baseline) and 24 h after footshock for the indicated groups. ANOVA for freezing at 24 h showed a significant difference among groups (F(3,70) = 4.424, p = 0.0066). Tukey's multiple comparisons show that only the control+Aβ group was significantly different from all other groups (p = 0.0218 vs control+vehicle, p = 0.0367 vs PME-KO+vehicle, and p = 0.0164 vs PME-KO+Aβ*). No differences in baseline freezing on day 1 were observed among groups (ANOVA: F(3,70) = 0.7894, p = 0.5039). N = 16 control+vehicle, 20 control+Aβ, 20 PME-KO+vehicle, and 18 PME-KO+Aβ. B, Plot of average distance traveled (±SEM) for the indicated groups during 10 min exposures to an open field environment on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for distance with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 41.31, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 2, p = 0.1262). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. C, Plot of average number of entries into the center of an open field arena (±SEM) for the indicated groups during two 10 min exposures on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for entries with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 47.28, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 0.5627, p = 0.6422). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. D, Plot of average threshold for responses to footshocks of increasing intensity for the indicated groups revealed no significant differences in footshock perception (ANOVA for visible response: F(3,79) = 0.0092, p = 0.9988; for gross motor response: F(3,79) = 1.119, p = 0.3467; for vocalization: F(3,79) = 0.4069, p = 0.7484). N = 16 control+vehicle, 23 control+Aβ, 23 PME+vehicle, and 21 PME+Aβ.
Gray Squared Plexiglas Open Box (50 2), supplied by Panlab, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gray squared plexiglas open box (50 2)/product/Panlab
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gray squared plexiglas open box (50 2) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Heterozygous PME-KO mice are resistant to Aβ-induced impairments in contextual fear conditioning. A, Plot of average percent of time spent freezing (±SEM) during initial exposure to the training context (baseline) and 24 h after footshock for the indicated groups. ANOVA for freezing at 24 h showed a significant difference among groups (F(3,70) = 4.424, p = 0.0066). Tukey's multiple comparisons show that only the control+Aβ group was significantly different from all other groups (p = 0.0218 vs control+vehicle, p = 0.0367 vs PME-KO+vehicle, and p = 0.0164 vs PME-KO+Aβ*). No differences in baseline freezing on day 1 were observed among groups (ANOVA: F(3,70) = 0.7894, p = 0.5039). N = 16 control+vehicle, 20 control+Aβ, 20 PME-KO+vehicle, and 18 PME-KO+Aβ. B, Plot of average distance traveled (±SEM) for the indicated groups during 10 min exposures to an open field environment on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for distance with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 41.31, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 2, p = 0.1262). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. C, Plot of average number of entries into the center of an open field arena (±SEM) for the indicated groups during two 10 min exposures on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for entries with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 47.28, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 0.5627, p = 0.6422). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. D, Plot of average threshold for responses to footshocks of increasing intensity for the indicated groups revealed no significant differences in footshock perception (ANOVA for visible response: F(3,79) = 0.0092, p = 0.9988; for gross motor response: F(3,79) = 1.119, p = 0.3467; for vocalization: F(3,79) = 0.4069, p = 0.7484). N = 16 control+vehicle, 23 control+Aβ, 23 PME+vehicle, and 21 PME+Aβ.

Journal: The Journal of Neuroscience

Article Title: Reduced Expression of the PP2A Methylesterase, PME-1, or the PP2A Methyltransferase, LCMT-1, Alters Sensitivity to Beta-Amyloid-Induced Cognitive and Electrophysiological Impairments in Mice

doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2983-19.2020

Figure Lengend Snippet: Heterozygous PME-KO mice are resistant to Aβ-induced impairments in contextual fear conditioning. A, Plot of average percent of time spent freezing (±SEM) during initial exposure to the training context (baseline) and 24 h after footshock for the indicated groups. ANOVA for freezing at 24 h showed a significant difference among groups (F(3,70) = 4.424, p = 0.0066). Tukey's multiple comparisons show that only the control+Aβ group was significantly different from all other groups (p = 0.0218 vs control+vehicle, p = 0.0367 vs PME-KO+vehicle, and p = 0.0164 vs PME-KO+Aβ*). No differences in baseline freezing on day 1 were observed among groups (ANOVA: F(3,70) = 0.7894, p = 0.5039). N = 16 control+vehicle, 20 control+Aβ, 20 PME-KO+vehicle, and 18 PME-KO+Aβ. B, Plot of average distance traveled (±SEM) for the indicated groups during 10 min exposures to an open field environment on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for distance with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 41.31, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 2, p = 0.1262). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. C, Plot of average number of entries into the center of an open field arena (±SEM) for the indicated groups during two 10 min exposures on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for entries with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,49) = 47.28, p < 0.0001) but not group (F(3,49) = 0.5627, p = 0.6422). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 15 PME+vehicle, and 12 PME+Aβ. D, Plot of average threshold for responses to footshocks of increasing intensity for the indicated groups revealed no significant differences in footshock perception (ANOVA for visible response: F(3,79) = 0.0092, p = 0.9988; for gross motor response: F(3,79) = 1.119, p = 0.3467; for vocalization: F(3,79) = 0.4069, p = 0.7484). N = 16 control+vehicle, 23 control+Aβ, 23 PME+vehicle, and 21 PME+Aβ.

Article Snippet: Contextual fear conditioning Animals were placed into a transparent Plexiglas conditioning chamber (33 cm × 20 cm × 22 cm) (Noldus PhenoTyper).

Techniques: Control

Reduced LCMT-1 expression increases sensitivity to Aβ-induced impairments in contextual fear conditioning. A, Plot of average percent of time spent freezing (±SEM) during initial exposure to the training context (baseline) and 24 h after footshock for the indicated groups. ANOVA for freezing at 24 h showed a significant difference among groups (F(3,66) = 5.932, p = 0.0012). Tukey's multiple comparisons show that only the LCMT+Aβ group was significantly different from vehicle-treated controls (*p = 0.0015), and that the LCMT+Aβ group was also significantly different from Aβ-treated controls (p = 0.0272). No differences in baseline freezing on day 1 were observed among groups (ANOVA: F(3,66) = 1.284, p = 0.2873). N = 16 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 19 LCMT-GT+vehicle, and 19 LCMT-GT+Aβ. B, Plot of average distance traveled (±SEM) for the indicated groups during 10 min exposures to an open field environment on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for distance with day and group as factors showed no significant effect of day (F(1,44) = 1.284, p = 0.2634) or group (F(3,44) = 0.1835, p = 0.9070). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 9 control+Aβ, 13 LCMT-GT+vehicle, and 16 LCMT-GT+Aβ. C, Plot of average number of entries into the center of an open field arena (±SEM) for the indicated groups during two 10 min exposures on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for entries with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,54) = 7.45, p = 0.0085) but not group (F(3,54) = 0.6784, p = 0.5691). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 9 control+Aβ, 13 LCMT-GT+vehicle, and 16 LCMT-GT+Aβ. D, Plot of average threshold for responses to footshocks of increasing intensity for the indicated groups revealed no significant differences in footshock perception (ANOVA for visible response: F(3,74) = 0.5746, p = 0.6335; for gross motor response: F(3,74) = 0.1716, p = 0.91523; for vocalization: F(3,74) = 0.3167, p = 0.8133). N = 18 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 21 LCMT-GT+vehicle, and 23 LCMT-GT+Aβ.

Journal: The Journal of Neuroscience

Article Title: Reduced Expression of the PP2A Methylesterase, PME-1, or the PP2A Methyltransferase, LCMT-1, Alters Sensitivity to Beta-Amyloid-Induced Cognitive and Electrophysiological Impairments in Mice

doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2983-19.2020

Figure Lengend Snippet: Reduced LCMT-1 expression increases sensitivity to Aβ-induced impairments in contextual fear conditioning. A, Plot of average percent of time spent freezing (±SEM) during initial exposure to the training context (baseline) and 24 h after footshock for the indicated groups. ANOVA for freezing at 24 h showed a significant difference among groups (F(3,66) = 5.932, p = 0.0012). Tukey's multiple comparisons show that only the LCMT+Aβ group was significantly different from vehicle-treated controls (*p = 0.0015), and that the LCMT+Aβ group was also significantly different from Aβ-treated controls (p = 0.0272). No differences in baseline freezing on day 1 were observed among groups (ANOVA: F(3,66) = 1.284, p = 0.2873). N = 16 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 19 LCMT-GT+vehicle, and 19 LCMT-GT+Aβ. B, Plot of average distance traveled (±SEM) for the indicated groups during 10 min exposures to an open field environment on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for distance with day and group as factors showed no significant effect of day (F(1,44) = 1.284, p = 0.2634) or group (F(3,44) = 0.1835, p = 0.9070). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 9 control+Aβ, 13 LCMT-GT+vehicle, and 16 LCMT-GT+Aβ. C, Plot of average number of entries into the center of an open field arena (±SEM) for the indicated groups during two 10 min exposures on subsequent days revealed no significant differences between groups. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA for entries with day and group as factors shows a significant effect of day (F(1,54) = 7.45, p = 0.0085) but not group (F(3,54) = 0.6784, p = 0.5691). Pairwise Bonferroni comparisons between groups within a training day revealed no significant differences with p values < 0.05. N = 10 control+vehicle, 9 control+Aβ, 13 LCMT-GT+vehicle, and 16 LCMT-GT+Aβ. D, Plot of average threshold for responses to footshocks of increasing intensity for the indicated groups revealed no significant differences in footshock perception (ANOVA for visible response: F(3,74) = 0.5746, p = 0.6335; for gross motor response: F(3,74) = 0.1716, p = 0.91523; for vocalization: F(3,74) = 0.3167, p = 0.8133). N = 18 control+vehicle, 16 control+Aβ, 21 LCMT-GT+vehicle, and 23 LCMT-GT+Aβ.

Article Snippet: Contextual fear conditioning Animals were placed into a transparent Plexiglas conditioning chamber (33 cm × 20 cm × 22 cm) (Noldus PhenoTyper).

Techniques: Expressing, Control